On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 16:24, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:13 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk only
> > (since it impacts ABI)?
> >
> > Changes i
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 11:23 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:13 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk only
> > (since it impacts ABI)?
> >
> > Change
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:13 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk only
> (since it impacts ABI)?
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> - Condition on forward_iterator instead of default
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:13 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk only
> (since it impacts ABI)?
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> - Condition on forward_iterator instead of default_initializable.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> LWG 3569 adjusted join_view's iterator specif
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk only
(since it impacts ABI)?
Changes in v2:
- Condition on forward_iterator instead of default_initializable.
-- >8 --
LWG 3569 adjusted join_view's iterator specification to handle non
default-constructible iterators by wrapping the c
