On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:41:14 -0700
Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/05/2016 02:39 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >> 'make bootstrap' works fine on ia64 but I've failed to run 'make check'.
> >> Testsuite's LD_LIBRARY_PATHs are not correct and can run tests.
> >
> > You need to run 'make -k check' from the top
On 01/02/2016 04:50 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
I did ran tests only on amd64 host thus the execution failure tests.
Attached updated patch and test runs on a crosscompiler before
and after the change.
Now I'm building on real ia64 hardware as
make bootstrap
make -k check
for bot
On 01/05/2016 02:39 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
'make bootstrap' works fine on ia64 but I've failed to run 'make check'.
Testsuite's LD_LIBRARY_PATHs are not correct and can run tests.
You need to run 'make -k check' from the top level build directory.
No worries. I had an ia64 box provisioned wh
> 'make bootstrap' works fine on ia64 but I've failed to run 'make check'.
> Testsuite's LD_LIBRARY_PATHs are not correct and can run tests.
You need to run 'make -k check' from the top level build directory.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 11:50:56 +
Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Attached updated patch and test runs on a crosscompiler before
> and after the change.
>
> Now I'm building on real ia64 hardware as
> make bootstrap
> make -k check
>
> for both clean and patched trees.
'make bootstrap' wor
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 00:30:58 -0700
Jeff Law wrote:
> > That way gcc will be able to compile glibc's ld: PR/60465
> Egad. PIC on ia64 is a mess. I can kind of see what Richard was trying
> to do, but ewww. I don't think it's worth the effort to deep dive into
> the PIC support and make ia64 handl
