On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:51 PM Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
> when debugging expmed.[ch] for PR/108987 saw that some of the cost arrays have
> less than ideal layout as follows:
>
>x_shift*cost[0..63][speed][modes]
>
> We would want speed to be first index since a typical compile will have
> that f
when debugging expmed.[ch] for PR/108987 saw that some of the cost arrays have
less than ideal layout as follows:
x_shift*cost[0..63][speed][modes]
We would want speed to be first index since a typical compile will have
that fixed, followed by mode and then the shift values.
It should be non-
