On 10/13/22 17:57, Paul Iannetta wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:41:16PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/13/22 12:02, Paul Iannetta wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:47:42AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/13/22 11:23, Paul Iannetta wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Jason
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:41:16PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/13/22 12:02, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:47:42AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 10/13/22 11:23, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > >
On 10/13/22 12:02, Paul Iannetta wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:47:42AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/13/22 11:23, Paul Iannetta wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/12/22 20:52, Paul Iannetta wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:49:43PM -0400, Jason
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:47:42AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/13/22 11:23, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 10/12/22 20:52, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:49:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > >
On 10/13/22 11:23, Paul Iannetta wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/12/22 20:52, Paul Iannetta wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:49:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
It surprises that this is the only place we complain about an object with an
address-sp
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/12/22 20:52, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:49:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > >
> > > It surprises that this is the only place we complain about an object with
> > > an
> > > address-space qualifier.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 07:46:46AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 02:52:59AM +0200, Paul Iannetta via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > + if (type != error_mark_node
> > + && !ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC_P (TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (type))
> > + && current_function_d
On 10/12/22 20:52, Paul Iannetta wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:49:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
It surprises that this is the only place we complain about an object with an
address-space qualifier. Shouldn't we also complain about e.g. automatic
variables/parameters or non-static data m
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 02:52:59AM +0200, Paul Iannetta via Gcc-patches wrote:
> + if (type != error_mark_node
> + && !ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC_P (TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (type))
> + && current_function_decl)
> + {
> + error
> +
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:49:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> It surprises that this is the only place we complain about an object with an
> address-space qualifier. Shouldn't we also complain about e.g. automatic
> variables/parameters or non-static data members with address-space qualified
On 10/11/22 18:03, Paul Iannetta wrote:
Thank you very much for the comments.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 03:20:13PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/9/22 12:12, Paul Iannetta wrote:
That's a nice feature! LLVM is using AS to mangle the
address-name qualified types but that would have required an
Thank you very much for the comments.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 03:20:13PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/9/22 12:12, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> > That's a nice feature! LLVM is using AS to mangle the
> > address-name qualified types but that would have required an update of
> > libiberty's demangl
12 matches
Mail list logo
