ch...@gmail.com;
tamar.christ...@arm.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; rdapp@gmail.com; Liu,
Hongtao
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Vect: Distribute truncation into .SAT_SUB operands
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 4:20 PM wrote:
>
> From: Pan Li
>
> To get better vectorized code of .SAT_SUB, we would li
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 4:20 PM wrote:
>
> From: Pan Li
>
> To get better vectorized code of .SAT_SUB, we would like to avoid the
> truncated operation for the assignment. For example, as below.
>
> unsigned int _1;
> unsigned int _2;
> _9 = (unsigned short int).SAT_SUB (_1, _2);
>
> If we make
pan2...@intel.com writes:
> From: Pan Li
>
> To get better vectorized code of .SAT_SUB, we would like to avoid the
> truncated operation for the assignment. For example, as below.
>
> unsigned int _1;
> unsigned int _2;
> _9 = (unsigned short int).SAT_SUB (_1, _2);
>
> If we make sure that the _
From: Pan Li
To get better vectorized code of .SAT_SUB, we would like to avoid the
truncated operation for the assignment. For example, as below.
unsigned int _1;
unsigned int _2;
_9 = (unsigned short int).SAT_SUB (_1, _2);
If we make sure that the _1 is in the range of unsigned short int. S
