PING^3 [PATCH v2] S/390: Improve storing asan frame_pc

> Am 02.07.2019 um 17:34 schrieb Ilya Leoshkevich : > > Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-redhat-linux, s390x-redhat-linux > and ppc64le-redhat-linux. > > Currently s390 emits the following sequence to store a frame_pc: > > a: > .LASANPC0: > > lg %r1,.L5-.L4

PING^2 [PATCH v2] S/390: Improve storing asan frame_pc

>> Am 02.07.2019 um 17:34 schrieb Ilya Leoshkevich : >> >> Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-redhat-linux, s390x-redhat-linux >> and ppc64le-redhat-linux. >> >> Currently s390 emits the following sequence to store a frame_pc: >> >> a: >> .LASANPC0: >> >> lg %

PING [PATCH v2] S/390: Improve storing asan frame_pc

Hello, I would like to ping this change. Best regards, Ilya > Am 02.07.2019 um 17:34 schrieb Ilya Leoshkevich : > > Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-redhat-linux, s390x-redhat-linux > and ppc64le-redhat-linux. > > Currently s390 emits the following sequence to store a frame_pc: > >

Re: [PATCH v2] S/390: Improve storing asan frame_pc

On 02.07.19 17:34, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: ... > 2019-06-28 Ilya Leoshkevich > > * asan.c (asan_emit_stack_protection): Provide an alignment > hint. > * config/s390/s390.h (CODE_LABEL_BOUNDARY): Specify that s390 > requires code labels to be aligned on a 2-byte boundary.

Re: [PATCH v2] S/390: Improve storing asan frame_pc

Hi Ilya, This looks great, thanks! You'll an okay from a global maintainer though, or of all affected maintainers separately. Segher On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:34:07PM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-redhat-linux, s390x-redhat-linux > and ppc64le-redha

[PATCH v2] S/390: Improve storing asan frame_pc

Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-redhat-linux, s390x-redhat-linux and ppc64le-redhat-linux. Currently s390 emits the following sequence to store a frame_pc: a: .LASANPC0: lg %r1,.L5-.L4(%r13) la %r1,0(%r1,%r12) stg