Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: testsuite: Add vector_hw and zvfh_hw checks.

On 7/27/23 06:02, Robin Dapp wrote: LGTM, I just found this patch still on the list, I mostly tested with qemu, so I don't think that is a problem before, but I realize it's a problem when we run on a real board that does not support those extensions. I think we can skip this one as I needed

Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: testsuite: Add vector_hw and zvfh_hw checks.

> LGTM, I just found this patch still on the list, I mostly tested with > qemu, so I don't think that is a problem before, but I realize it's a > problem when we run on a real board that does not support those > extensions. I think we can skip this one as I needed to introduce vector_hw and zvfh_h

Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: testsuite: Add vector_hw and zvfh_hw checks.

LGTM, I just found this patch still on the list, I mostly tested with qemu, so I don't think that is a problem before, but I realize it's a problem when we run on a real board that does not support those extensions. On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 6:07 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > On 6/15/2

Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: testsuite: Add vector_hw and zvfh_hw checks.

On 6/15/23 09:06, Robin Dapp wrote: Hi, Changes from v1: - Revamped the target selectors again. - Fixed some syntax as well as caching errors that were still present. - Adjusted some test cases I missed. The current situation with target selectors is improvable at best. We definitely n

[PATCH v2] RISC-V: testsuite: Add vector_hw and zvfh_hw checks.

Hi, Changes from v1: - Revamped the target selectors again. - Fixed some syntax as well as caching errors that were still present. - Adjusted some test cases I missed. The current situation with target selectors is improvable at best. We definitely need to discern between being able to build a