...@rivai.ai
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for RVV vbool*_t vn_reference_equal.
Oh, I see. This PATCH month drafted ago and missed that part. Sorry for
inconvenient and will update it ASAP.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Kito Cheng
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 10:05 PM
To: Li
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for RVV vbool*_t vn_reference_equal.
Plz write description for every item in changelog, otherwise the gcc git hook
will reject this patch.
remote: *** The following commit was rejected by your
hooks.commit-extra-checker script (status: 1)
remote
e.com
> Cc: gcc-patches ; Kito.cheng
> ; Wang, Yanzhang ;
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
> Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for RVV vbool*_t
> vn_reference_equal.
>
> Hi Kito,
>
> There is one patch reviewed already and I suppose it will be ok after GCC 14
> open
: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for RVV vbool*_t vn_reference_equal.
Hi Kito,
There is one patch reviewed already and I suppose it will be ok after GCC 14
open. Could you please help to double check about it?
Pann
-Original Message-
From: Gcc-patches On Behalf
Of Li, Pan2 via Gcc
; rguenther
Cc: gcc-patches ; Kito.cheng ;
Wang, Yanzhang
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for RVV vbool*_t vn_reference_equal.
Cool. Thank you all for this, have a nice day!
Pan
From: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 5:35 PM
To: rguenther ; Li, Pan2
Cc: gcc
Cool. Thank you all for this, have a nice day!
Pan
From: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 5:35 PM
To: rguenther ; Li, Pan2
Cc: gcc-patches ; Kito.cheng ;
Wang, Yanzhang
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for RVV vbool*_t vn_reference_equal.
Thanks Richard &&
] RISC-V: Bugfix for RVV vbool*_t vn_reference_equal.
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, pan2...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Pan Li
>
> In most architecture the precision_size of vbool*_t types are caculated
> like as the multiple of the type size. For example:
> precision_size = type_size * 8 (a
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, pan2...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Pan Li
>
> In most architecture the precision_size of vbool*_t types are caculated
> like as the multiple of the type size. For example:
> precision_size = type_size * 8 (aka, bit count per bytes).
>
> Unfortunately, some architecture like
From: Pan Li
In most architecture the precision_size of vbool*_t types are caculated
like as the multiple of the type size. For example:
precision_size = type_size * 8 (aka, bit count per bytes).
Unfortunately, some architecture like RISC-V will adjust the precision_size
for the vbool*_t in ord
