Re: [PATCH v2] PR92398: Fix testcase failure of pr72804.c

Hi! On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 04:21:07PM +0800, luoxhu wrote: > On 2019/11/15 18:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:12:32PM -0600, Xiong Hu Luo wrote: > >> P9LE generated instruction is not worse than P8LE. > >> mtvsrdd;xxlnot;stxv vs. not;not;std;std. > >> Update the test

Re: [PATCH v2] PR92398: Fix testcase failure of pr72804.c

Hi, On 2019/11/15 18:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:12:32PM -0600, Xiong Hu Luo wrote: >> P9LE generated instruction is not worse than P8LE. >> mtvsrdd;xxlnot;stxv vs. not;not;std;std. >> Update the test case to fix failures. > > So this no longer runs it for