Re: [PATCH v2] IBM Z: Handle hard registers in s390_md_asm_adjust()

On 5/3/21 1:09 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 08:49 +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> On 4/28/21 3:48 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: >>> Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux.  Tested with >>> valgrind >>> too (PR 100278 is now fixed).  Ok for master? >>> >>> v1: >>> htt

Re: [PATCH v2] IBM Z: Handle hard registers in s390_md_asm_adjust()

On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 08:49 +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > On 4/28/21 3:48 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux.  Tested with > > valgrind > > too (PR 100278 is now fixed).  Ok for master? > > > > v1: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-A

Re: [PATCH v2] IBM Z: Handle hard registers in s390_md_asm_adjust()

On 4/28/21 3:48 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux. Tested with valgrind > too (PR 100278 is now fixed). Ok for master? > > v1: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568771.html > v1 -> v2: Use the UNSPEC pattern, which is less efficient

[PATCH v2] IBM Z: Handle hard registers in s390_md_asm_adjust()

Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x-redhat-linux. Tested with valgrind too (PR 100278 is now fixed). Ok for master? v1: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568771.html v1 -> v2: Use the UNSPEC pattern, which is less efficient, but is more on the "obviously correct" sid