Am 05.08.24 um 12:28 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus:
This is a follow-up of
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/654013.html
Hi Stefan,
as an addition, maybe a built-in macro is useful that tells the target
code whether the feature is available.
Similar to __GXX_CONSTEXPR_
Am 05.08.24 um 15:59 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 02:19:50PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Am 05.08.24 um 12:28 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus:
This is rather unfortunate but I couldn't find a way how to validate
register names during genoutput. If no one
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 02:19:50PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Am 05.08.24 um 12:28 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus:
> > This is a follow-up of
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/654013.html
> >
> > What has changed?
> >
> > - Rebased and fixed an issue in constrain_
Am 05.08.24 um 12:28 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus:
This is a follow-up of
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/654013.html
What has changed?
- Rebased and fixed an issue in constrain_operands which manifested
after late-combine.
- Introduced new test cases for Arm, Intel,
This is a follow-up of
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/654013.html
What has changed?
- Rebased and fixed an issue in constrain_operands which manifested
after late-combine.
- Introduced new test cases for Arm, Intel, POWER, RISCV, S/390 for 32-
and 64-bit where appropriate (i
