On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Nathan has approved this from the C++ perspective (and Martin said that his
> comments were "not necessarily to object to the idea behind the attribute but
> to draw attention to the fact that it's not suitable for standard APIs.”)
>
> So
Hi Joseph,
Nathan has approved this from the C++ perspective (and Martin said that his
comments were "not necessarily to object to the idea behind the attribute
but
to draw attention to the fact that it's not suitable for standard APIs.”)
So, I wonder, do you have more comments on the revise
Hi Martin,
Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/29/20 6:56 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 11/10/20 12:38 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
—— commit message.
If an interface is marked 'deprecated' then, presumably, at some point
it
will be withdrawn and no longer available.
On 11/29/20 6:56 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi Martin,
Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 11/10/20 12:38 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
—— commit message.
If an interface is marked 'deprecated' then, presumably, at some
point it
will be withdrawn and no longer available. The 'unavailable' attri
On 11/27/20 3:49 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi
I believe this version addressed Joseph’s and Richard’s comment, but it
C++ review.
ok. Found a doc nit though ...
+@item unavailable
+@itemx unavailable (@var{msg})
+@cindex @code{unavailable} function attribute
+The @code{deprecated} attribute r
Hi Martin,
Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 11/10/20 12:38 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
—— commit message.
If an interface is marked 'deprecated' then, presumably, at some point it
will be withdrawn and no longer available. The 'unavailable' attribute
makes it possible to mark up interface
On 11/10/20 12:38 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi Jospeh,
Joseph Myers wrote:
This patch seems to be missing documentation for the new attribute in
extend.texi.
Apologies, for that omission, revised patch includes the documentation and
also addresses Richi’s comments.
documentation patch tested
Hi
I believe this version addressed Joseph’s and Richard’s comment, but it
C++ review.
thanks
Iain
Iain Sandoe wrote:
Joseph Myers wrote:
This patch seems to be missing documentation for the new attribute in
extend.texi.
Apologies, for that omission, revised patch includes the documen
Hi Jospeh,
Joseph Myers wrote:
> This patch seems to be missing documentation for the new attribute in
> extend.texi.
Apologies, for that omission, revised patch includes the documentation and
also addresses Richi’s comments.
documentation patch tested with “make pdf” and visual inspection of
