Re: [PATCH v2] Add new warning Wmissing-designated-initializers [PR39589]

2024-11-22 Thread Marek Polacek
On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 10:17:14PM +0100, Peter Frost wrote: > v2 Patch: > * adds proper changelog text > * fixes typo in c.opt > > Currently the behaviour of Wmissing-field-initializers is inconsistent > between C and C++. The C warning assumes that missing designated > initializers

[PING #3][PATCH v2] Add new warning Wmissing-designated-initializers [PR39589]

2024-11-14 Thread Peter Frost
Hi all, Pinginghttps://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662590.html for a review if anyone has a moment. Many thanks, Peter

Re: [PATCH v2] Add new warning Wmissing-designated-initializers [PR39589]

2024-10-06 Thread Peter Frost
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662590.html

[PATCH v2] Add new warning Wmissing-designated-initializers [PR39589]

2024-09-07 Thread Peter Frost
v2 Patch: * adds proper changelog text * fixes typo in c.opt Currently the behaviour of Wmissing-field-initializers is inconsistent between C and C++. The C warning assumes that missing designated initializers are deliberate, and does not warn. The C++ warning does warn for missin