On 9/20/2024 10:51 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Saurabh,
On 9/18/24 21:53, Saurabh Jha wrote:
Hi Wilco,
Thanks for the patch. This mostly looks good. Just added a couple
clarifications.
On 9/18/2024 8:17 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
v2: Add more testcase fixes.
The current copysign pattern
Hi Saurabh,
On 9/18/24 21:53, Saurabh Jha wrote:
Hi Wilco,
Thanks for the patch. This mostly looks good. Just added a couple
clarifications.
On 9/18/2024 8:17 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
v2: Add more testcase fixes.
The current copysign pattern has a mismatch in the predicates and
constrain
Wilco Dijkstra writes:
> v2: Add more testcase fixes.
>
> The current copysign pattern has a mismatch in the predicates and constraints
> -
> operand[2] is a register_operand but also has an alternative X which allows
> any
> operand. Since it is a floating point operation, having an integer
>
Hi Wilco,
Thanks for the patch. This mostly looks good. Just added a couple
clarifications.
On 9/18/2024 8:17 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
v2: Add more testcase fixes.
The current copysign pattern has a mismatch in the predicates and constraints -
operand[2] is a register_operand but also has a
v2: Add more testcase fixes.
The current copysign pattern has a mismatch in the predicates and constraints -
operand[2] is a register_operand but also has an alternative X which allows any
operand. Since it is a floating point operation, having an integer alternative
makes no sense. Change the e
