On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 8:05 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Scratch the previous one, the "slightly different version" I had before
> it was not entirely broken due to unnecessary, suboptimal and incorrect
> use of ctz. Here I have yet another implementation of that loop that
> should perform bette
Scratch the previous one, the "slightly different version" I had before
it was not entirely broken due to unnecessary, suboptimal and incorrect
use of ctz. Here I have yet another implementation of that loop that
should perform better and even work correctly ;-)
This one has so far regstrapped o
