> On 20.11.2018, at 17:43, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 20/11/18 16:20, Christoph Müllner wrote:
>>> On 20.11.2018, at 17:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Christoph,
>>>
>>> On 20/11/18 15:22, Christoph Muellner wrote:
Tested with "make check" and no regressions found.
**
On 20/11/18 16:20, Christoph Müllner wrote:
On 20.11.2018, at 17:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Christoph,
On 20/11/18 15:22, Christoph Muellner wrote:
Tested with "make check" and no regressions found.
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2018-xx-xx Christoph Muellner
* config/aarch64/aarch64-
> On 20.11.2018, at 17:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 20/11/18 15:22, Christoph Muellner wrote:
>> Tested with "make check" and no regressions found.
>>
>> *** gcc/ChangeLog ***
>>
>> 2018-xx-xx Christoph Muellner
>>
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Define e
Hi Christoph,
On 20/11/18 15:22, Christoph Muellner wrote:
Tested with "make check" and no regressions found.
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2018-xx-xx Christoph Muellner
* config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Define emag.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-tune.md: Regenerated with emag.
Tested with "make check" and no regressions found.
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2018-xx-xx Christoph Muellner
* config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def: Define emag.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-tune.md: Regenerated with emag.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (emag_tunings): New struct.