Re: [PATCH v2] [aarch64] [vxworks] mark x18 as fixed, adjust tests

2025-05-22 Thread Olivier Hainque
Thanks Alex & Richard! On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 12:41, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Alexandre Oliva writes: > > On May 21, 2025, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > > >> I think this one shows a deeper issue, though. > -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > >> is currently hardcoded to use x18: > > > > Oh, indee

Re: [PATCH v2] [aarch64] [vxworks] mark x18 as fixed, adjust tests

2025-05-22 Thread Richard Sandiford
Alexandre Oliva writes: > On May 21, 2025, Richard Sandiford wrote: > >> I think this one shows a deeper issue, though. -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack >> is currently hardcoded to use x18: > > Oh, indeed! > >> and I assume this usage will be incompatible with the TCB usage. > >> So I think instead

[PATCH v2] [aarch64] [vxworks] mark x18 as fixed, adjust tests

2025-05-22 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 21, 2025, Richard Sandiford wrote: > I think this one shows a deeper issue, though. -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack > is currently hardcoded to use x18: Oh, indeed! > and I assume this usage will be incompatible with the TCB usage. > So I think instead we should emit a sorry() if -fsaniti