Hi Bernhard,
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 02:54:31AM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> I suspect /Burnas/s/a/u/
Yeah; it seems to be wrong in the original testcase already
(gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/streamio_11.f90).
> Why do you need a separate fortran.exp?
> Can't this be a PPC test in the F
On 7 April 2017 21:54:24 CEST, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>Hi Kelvin,
>
>Sorry this has fallen by the wayside. I did mark it "to do", and then
>promptly buried it. Whoops.
>
>On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:36:00AM -0600, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
>
>> +dg-test $gfortran_test_path/[lindex $args 1] ""
Hi Kelvin,
Sorry this has fallen by the wayside. I did mark it "to do", and then
promptly buried it. Whoops.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:36:00AM -0600, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> +dg-test $gfortran_test_path/[lindex $args 1] ""
> $gfortran_aux_module_flags
Your mailer messed up this line (and
I am reposting this patch, previously posted just moments ago, to
correct the subject so that it clarifies that this is a rs6000-specific
patch. Thanks.
PR 80108 describes an ICE that occurs on an existing test program when
compiled with a particular combination of target options.
This patch fix
