On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> 2012-11-16 Uros Bizjak
>>
>> * lib/target_suports.exp
>> (check_effective_target_has_w_floating_suffix): New procedure.
>> (check_effective_target_has_q_floating_suffix): Ditto.
>> * g++.dg/cpp0x/gnu_fext-numeric-
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:53:54AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> 2012-11-16 Uros Bizjak
>
> * lib/target_suports.exp
> (check_effective_target_has_w_floating_suffix): New procedure.
> (check_effective_target_has_q_floating_suffix): Ditto.
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/gnu_fext-numeric-
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> >> No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
>>> >> suffixes through TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX. Please note that in
>>> >> particular tests, -std=x compile switches are added to compile flags.
>>> >
>>> > But -std=
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> >> No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
>> >> suffixes through TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX. Please note that in
>> >> particular tests, -std=x compile switches are added to compile flags.
>> >
>> > But -std=c++
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:42:32PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:31:42PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >> No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
> >> suffixes through TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_S
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:31:42PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
>> suffixes through TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX. Please note that in
>> particular tests, -std=x compile switch
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:31:42PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> No, the intention of this test is to check if target can handle these
> suffixes through TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX. Please note that in
> particular tests, -std=x compile switches are added to compile flags.
But -std=c++11 (well, perhap
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:20:48PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> This revision auto-detect support for Q and W suffixes.
>>
>> 2012-11-15 Uros Bizjak
>>
>> * lib/target_suports.exp
>> (check_effective_target_has_w_floating_suffi
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:20:48PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> This revision auto-detect support for Q and W suffixes.
>
> 2012-11-15 Uros Bizjak
>
> * lib/target_suports.exp
> (check_effective_target_has_w_floating_suffix): New procedure.
> (check_effective_target_has_q_floa
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Attached patch fixes following testsuite failure
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/gnu_fext-numeric-literals.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/std_fext-numeric-literals.C (test for excess errors)
>
> on targets that don't support Q and W fl
10 matches
Mail list logo
