On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:44 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> This patch has broken bootstrap on AIX and possibly powerpc64-linux.
>> Was this patch tested on any architecture other than x86?
>
> No.
>
>> /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libgcc/emutls.c:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:44 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> This patch has broken bootstrap on AIX and possibly powerpc64-linux.
> Was this patch tested on any architecture other than x86?
No.
> /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libgcc/emutls.c: In function '__emutls_get_address':
> /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/s
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:44 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> This patch has broken bootstrap on AIX and possibly powerpc64-linux.
> Was this patch tested on any architecture other than x86?
>
> /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libgcc/emutls.c: In function '__emutls_get_address':
> /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/
This patch has broken bootstrap on AIX and possibly powerpc64-linux.
Was this patch tested on any architecture other than x86?
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libgcc/emutls.c: In function '__emutls_get_address':
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libgcc/emutls.c:139:11: internal compiler
error: in invalid_void,
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> Revised patch, incorporates fixes from Alexander's review comments.
>>>
>>> I removed some implementation details from Alexander'
On 14 October 2017 at 12:16, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> Revised patch, incorporates fixes from Alexander's review comments.
>>>
>>> I removed some implementation details from Alexander's des
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Revised patch, incorporates fixes from Alexander's review comments.
>>
>> I removed some implementation details from Alexander's description of
>> memory_blockage named pattern.
>>
>>
>> 20
On 10/13/2017 12:27 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 09/05/2017 07:50 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> Revised patch, incorporates fixes from Alexander's review comments.
>>>
>>> I removed some implementation details from Alexander's description of
>>> memo
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/05/2017 07:50 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Revised patch, incorporates fixes from Alexander's review comments.
>>
>> I removed some implementation details from Alexander's description of
>> memory_blockage named pattern.
>>
>>
>> 2017-09-05 Ur
On 09/05/2017 07:50 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Revised patch, incorporates fixes from Alexander's review comments.
>
> I removed some implementation details from Alexander's description of
> memory_blockage named pattern.
>
>
> 2017-09-05 Uros Bizjak
>
> * target-insns.def: Add memory_bloc
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Revised patch, incorporates fixes from Alexander's review comments.
>
> I removed some implementation details from Alexander's description of
> memory_blockage named pattern.
>
>
> 2017-09-05 Uros Bizjak
>
> * target-insns.def: Add memory
On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Revised patch, incorporates fixes from Alexander's review comments.
>
> I removed some implementation details from Alexander's description of
> memory_blockage named pattern.
Well, to me it wasn't really obvious why a named pattern was needed
in the first
Revised patch, incorporates fixes from Alexander's review comments.
I removed some implementation details from Alexander's description of
memory_blockage named pattern.
2017-09-05 Uros Bizjak
* target-insns.def: Add memory_blockage.
* optabs.c (expand_memory_blockage): New function.
13 matches
Mail list logo