On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 04:18:56PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > + set_musttail_on_return (retval, xloc, musttail_p);
> > > > > +
> > > > >if (retval)
> > > > > {
> > > > >tree semantic_type = NULL_TREE;
> > > >
> > > > Is it deliberate that set_musttail_on_return is called
> > > > + set_musttail_on_return (retval, xloc, musttail_p);
> > > > +
> > > >if (retval)
> > > > {
> > > >tree semantic_type = NULL_TREE;
> > >
> > > Is it deliberate that set_musttail_on_return is called outside the
> > > if (retval) block? If it can be moved into it, set_must
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 03:11:56PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 02:19:21PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:30:00PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Implement a C23 clang compatible musttail attribute similar to the earlier
> > > C++ implementation in t
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 02:19:21PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:30:00PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Implement a C23 clang compatible musttail attribute similar to the earlier
> > C++ implementation in the C parser.
> >
> > gcc/c/ChangeLog:
> >
> > PR c/83324
> >
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:30:00PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Implement a C23 clang compatible musttail attribute similar to the earlier
> C++ implementation in the C parser.
>
> gcc/c/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c/83324
> * c-parser.cc (struct attr_state): Define with musttail_p.
> (c_pa
Implement a C23 clang compatible musttail attribute similar to the earlier
C++ implementation in the C parser.
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
PR c/83324
* c-parser.cc (struct attr_state): Define with musttail_p.
(c_parser_statement_after_labels): Handle [[musttail]].
(c_parser_s
