Kito, thanks: you were a few minutes ahead of my fix there.
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 16:00, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Hi Andreas:
>
> Fixed via
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=d6b423882a05d7b4f40ae1e9d942c9c4c13761b7
> ,
> thanks!
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 4:34 PM Andreas Schwab
> wro
Hi Andreas:
Fixed via
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=d6b423882a05d7b4f40ae1e9d942c9c4c13761b7,
thanks!
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 4:34 PM Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md: In function 'rtx_insn*
> gen_split_44(rtx_ins\
> n*, rtx_def**)':
> ../../gcc/conf
../../gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md: In function 'rtx_insn* gen_split_44(rtx_ins\
n*, rtx_def**)':
../../gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md:110:28: error: comparison of integer express\
ions of different signedness: 'int' and 'long unsigned int' [-Werror=sign-compa\
re]
110 | if ((scale + bias)
Thanks, applied to master!
For [3/3], I'll submit a new standalone patch with the requested changes.
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 12:25, Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> LGTM, you can commit that without [3/3] if you like :)
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:47 AM Philipp Tomsich
> wrote:
> >
> > When encountering a
LGTM, you can commit that without [3/3] if you like :)
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:47 AM Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
>
> When encountering a prescaled (biased) value as a candidate for
> sh[123]add.uw, the combine pass will present this as shifted by the
> aggregate amount (prescale + shift-amount) with
When encountering a prescaled (biased) value as a candidate for
sh[123]add.uw, the combine pass will present this as shifted by the
aggregate amount (prescale + shift-amount) with an appropriately
adjusted mask constant that has fewer than 32 bits set.
E.g., here's the failing expression seen in c
