On 03/12/2024 10:41, Claudio Bantaloukas wrote:
On 12/3/2024 10:24 AM, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
Hi Claudio,
On 2 Dec 2024, at 19:14, Claudio Bantaloukas
wrote:
The previous version of the patch was based on the mistaken
assumption that
features in /proc/cpuinfo had matching names to the fe
> On 3 Dec 2024, at 11:41, Claudio Bantaloukas
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/3/2024 10:24 AM, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>> Hi Claudio,
>>> On 2 Dec 2024, at 19:14, Claudio Bantaloukas
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The previous version of the patch was based on the mistaken assumption that
>>> features in
On 12/3/2024 10:24 AM, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
Hi Claudio,
On 2 Dec 2024, at 19:14, Claudio Bantaloukas
wrote:
The previous version of the patch was based on the mistaken assumption that
features in /proc/cpuinfo had matching names to the feature names that gcc and
gas accept.
This patch e
Hi Claudio,
> On 2 Dec 2024, at 19:14, Claudio Bantaloukas
> wrote:
>
>
> The previous version of the patch was based on the mistaken assumption that
> features in /proc/cpuinfo had matching names to the feature names that gcc and
> gas accept.
> This patch enables the fp8 feature when the f8c
The previous version of the patch was based on the mistaken assumption that
features in /proc/cpuinfo had matching names to the feature names that gcc and
gas accept.
This patch enables the fp8 feature when the f8cvt feature is enabled, under the
assumption that fpmr is always enabled when f8cvt i
