Pre-approve the fix :)
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 6:07 AM Tsukasa OI wrote:
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Found a cause (although GCC is functionally correct, I forgot to fix
> corresponding test case [which assumes that 'E' is not ratified]).
>
> > #if !defined(__riscv_e) || (__riscv_e != (1 * 1000 * 1000 +
Hi Patrick,
Found a cause (although GCC is functionally correct, I forgot to fix
corresponding test case [which assumes that 'E' is not ratified]).
> #if !defined(__riscv_e) || (__riscv_e != (1 * 1000 * 1000 + 9 * 1000))
> #error "__riscv_e"
> #endif
1*1000*1000 + 9*1000 ('E' version 1.9) should
Hi Tsukasa,
I'm seeing a new regression across all tested riscv targets:
https://github.com/patrick-rivos/gcc-postcommit-ci/issues/224
Regression:
|FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/predef-13.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL:
gcc.target/riscv/predef-13.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL:
gcc.target/
On 11/24/23 03:18, Tsukasa OI wrote:
From: Tsukasa OI
Along with RV32E, RV64E is ratified. Though ILP32E and LP64E ABIs are
still draft, it's worth supporting it.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
(riscv_ext_version_table): Set version to ratified 2.0.
From: Tsukasa OI
Along with RV32E, RV64E is ratified. Though ILP32E and LP64E ABIs are
still draft, it's worth supporting it.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
(riscv_ext_version_table): Set version to ratified 2.0.
(riscv_subset_list::parse_std_ext):
