On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:26 PM Roger Sayle wrote:
>
>
> Hi Uros,
> Many thanks for the review. Here's a revised patch incorporating your
> suggestion to use a single define_insn with a mode iterator instead of two
> new near identical define_insns for SImode and DImode. I initially tried
> SWI
Hi Uros,
Many thanks for the review. Here's a revised patch incorporating your
suggestion to use a single define_insn with a mode iterator instead of two
new near identical define_insns for SImode and DImode. I initially tried
SWI48, but a testsuite failure of pr82418.c revealed that it's more
e
