On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>> >> In a couple of places, checks are changed to GET_MODE_SIZE
>> >> (GET_MODE (operands[0])) and in a similar way, mode checks were
>> >> changed to GET_MODE (operands[0]). The previous checks are more
>> >> efficient and are preferred. Is
On 13 Aug 15:21, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
>
> >> In a couple of places, checks are changed to GET_MODE_SIZE
> >> (GET_MODE (operands[0])) and in a similar way, mode checks were
> >> changed to GET_MODE (operands[0]). The previous checks are mo
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>> In a couple of places, checks are changed to GET_MODE_SIZE
>> (GET_MODE (operands[0])) and in a similar way, mode checks were
>> changed to GET_MODE (operands[0]). The previous checks are more
>> efficient and are preferred. Is there a rea
Hello Uroš,
On 12 Aug 20:16, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> In a couple of places, checks are changed to GET_MODE_SIZE
> (GET_MODE (operands[0])) and in a similar way, mode checks were
> changed to GET_MODE (operands[0]). The previous checks are more
> efficient and are preferred. Is there a reason you need
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> This patch extends substs/subst_attrs to be used
> with new patterns.
>
> Bootstrapped.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?
In a couple of places, checks are changed to GET_MODE_SIZE
(GET_MODE (operands[0])) and in a similar way, mode checks w
Hello,
This patch extends substs/subst_attrs to be used
with new patterns.
Bootstrapped.
Is it ok for trunk?
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md: Allow V64QI, V32QI, V32HI, V4HI modes.
* config/i386/subst.md
(define_mode_iterator SUBST_V): Update.
(define_mode_iterator SUBS
