On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> 2014-01-30 H.J. Lu :
>>> + { OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2, CODE_FOR_sha256rnds2, 0,
>>> IX86_BUILTIN_SHA256RNDS2, UNKNOWN, (int) V4SI_FTYPE_V4SI_V4SI_V4SI },
>> ^ Is OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2
>> intentional?
>> Sh
2014-01-30 H.J. Lu :
>> + { OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2, CODE_FOR_sha256rnds2, 0,
>> IX86_BUILTIN_SHA256RNDS2, UNKNOWN, (int) V4SI_FTYPE_V4SI_V4SI_V4SI },
> ^ Is OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2 intentional?
> Should it be OPTION_MASK_ISA_SHA?
> --
> H.J.
This was done by an
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> On 19 Nov 15:36, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Please also add new command options to g++.dg/other/sse-2.C and
>> g++.dg/other/sse-3.C
> Done (to i386-[23].C).
>> > --mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512pf -mavx512er -mavx512cd @gol
>> > +-mavx2 -mavx51
Hello,
On 19 Nov 15:36, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Please also add new command options to g++.dg/other/sse-2.C and
> g++.dg/other/sse-3.C
Done (to i386-[23].C).
> > --mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512pf -mavx512er -mavx512cd @gol
> > +-mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512pf -mavx512er -mavx512cd -msha -mno-sha @gol
>
> No n
On 19 Nov 15:36, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Please also add new command options to g++.dg/other/sse-2.C and
> g++.dg/other/sse-3.C
>
> OK with the small nit below and with above testsute addition.
>
> No need to document negative option here.
Thanks! I'll fix your inputs and check in after rest is rev
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> This patch introduces new SHA instructions described in [1]
> along with tests.
>
> Testing:
> 1. Bootstrap pass.
> 2. make check shows no regressions.
> 3. Spec 2000 & 2006 build show no regressions both with and without
> -m
Hello,
This patch introduces new SHA instructions described in [1]
along with tests.
Testing:
1. Bootstrap pass.
2. make check shows no regressions.
3. Spec 2000 & 2006 build show no regressions both with and without -mavx512f
option.
4. Spec 2000 & 2006 run shows no stability regressions
