On Sun, 10 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> You probably need to update comment here. I wonder what happens when we
> optimize
> indirect call to direct call to global function at RTL level? I suppose we are
> safe here, because at RTL level we explicitly represent if we refer to PLT
> entry
> or t
> In the i386 backend, tailcalls are incorrectly disallowed in PIC mode for
> calls via function pointers on the basis that indirect calls, like direct
> calls, would go via PLT and thus require %ebx to point to GOT -- but that is
> not true. Quoting Rich Felker who reported the bug,
>
> "For P
In the i386 backend, tailcalls are incorrectly disallowed in PIC mode for
calls via function pointers on the basis that indirect calls, like direct
calls, would go via PLT and thus require %ebx to point to GOT -- but that is
not true. Quoting Rich Felker who reported the bug,
"For PLT slots in
