Jonathan Wakely writes:
> This looks more accurate than the current wording, yes.
>
> Specifically, only objects/libraries "built with experimental standard
> support" need to be recompiled.
>
> LGTM, but I'll let Jason give approval.
>
ping (I've found myself citing this section a few times rec
This looks more accurate than the current wording, yes.
Specifically, only objects/libraries "built with experimental standard
support" need to be recompiled.
LGTM, but I'll let Jason give approval.
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 09:30, Sam James wrote:
>
> C++ ABI for C++ standards with full suppor
C++ ABI for C++ standards with full support by GCC (rather than those
marked as experimental per https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html)
should be stable. It's certainly not the case in 2025 that one needs a
full world rebuild for C++ libraries using e.g. the default standard
or any other sup
