2011/8/16 Andreas Schwab :
> * ggc.h (ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized): Use ggc_alloc_zone_rtvec_def
> instead of ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def.
Thanks again,
--
Laurynas
Laurynas Biveinis writes:
> The patch to adjust the definition is obvious/pre-approved if anyone's
> inclined, or I'll just note in my TODO to fix this the next time I
> commit something.
Since I had it already readily tested on x86_64-linux, I've checked this
in.
Andreas.
2011-08-16 Andreas
2011/8/16 Richard Guenther :
>> ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def is for allocating an array of rtvec_def,
>> but you want a single (variable sized) rtvec_def, so
>> ggc_alloc_zone_rtvec_def is the correct function to call.
>
> I'm not so sure about that given the more strongly typing of our allocators.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Liang Wang writes:
>
>> #define ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized(NELT) \
>> - (ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def (sizeof (rtx), \
>> - sizeof (struct rtvec_def
Liang Wang writes:
> #define ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized(NELT) \
> -(ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def (sizeof (rtx),\
> - sizeof (struct rtvec_def) + ((NELT) - 1),
> \
> +(ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def (1
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Liang Wang wrote:
> Current implementation of ggc_alloc_rtvec_resized allocates more
> spaces for rtvec. This patch uses original formula to compute size
> for rtvec. Bootstrap on x86_64 successfully.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> By the way, I don't have write access t
Current implementation of ggc_alloc_rtvec_resized allocates more
spaces for rtvec. This patch uses original formula to compute size
for rtvec. Bootstrap on x86_64 successfully.
OK for trunk?
By the way, I don't have write access to SVN repository yet. Could
you please help commit it after appr
