Dear Dominique,
That looks OK to me for 5 through 7-branches.
Thanks
Paul
On 10 June 2016 at 19:05, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
> The attached patch fixes pr60751 by allowing extra comma in WRITE statement
> for std=legacy only, tested on x86_64-apple-darwin15. Is it OK for trunk, and
> the
The attached patch fixes pr60751 by allowing extra comma in WRITE statement for
std=legacy only, tested on x86_64-apple-darwin15. Is it OK for trunk, and the
gcc-5 and 6 branches?
TIA
Dominique
patch-60751b
Description: Binary data
