On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 12:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >
> > > On 02/28/2017 11:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On March 1, 2017 3:34:46 AM GMT+01:00, Martin Sebor
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On 02/28/2017 01:41 PM,
On 03/02/2017 12:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 02/28/2017 11:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On March 1, 2017 3:34:46 AM GMT+01:00, Martin Sebor
wrote:
On 02/28/2017 01:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On February 28, 2017 7:00:39 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 02/28/2017 11:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On March 1, 2017 3:34:46 AM GMT+01:00, Martin Sebor
> > wrote:
> > > On 02/28/2017 01:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On February 28, 2017 7:00:39 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law
> > > wrote:
> > > > > On 02/
On 02/28/2017 11:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On March 1, 2017 3:34:46 AM GMT+01:00, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 02/28/2017 01:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On February 28, 2017 7:00:39 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law
wrote:
On 02/28/2017 10:54 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The GCC 7 release criteria page ment
On 03/01/2017 08:08 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
The GCC 7 release criteria page mentions Java even though
the front end has been removed. The attached patch removes Java
from the criteria page. While reviewing the rest of the text I
noticed a few minor ty
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
The GCC 7 release criteria page mentions Java even though
the front end has been removed. The attached patch removes Java
from the criteria page. While reviewing the rest of the text I
noticed a few minor typos that I corrected in the patch as well.
Th
On March 1, 2017 3:34:46 AM GMT+01:00, Martin Sebor wrote:
>On 02/28/2017 01:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On February 28, 2017 7:00:39 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law
>wrote:
>>> On 02/28/2017 10:54 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The GCC 7 release criteria page mentions Java even though
the front en
On 02/28/2017 01:41 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On February 28, 2017 7:00:39 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
On 02/28/2017 10:54 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The GCC 7 release criteria page mentions Java even though
the front end has been removed. The attached patch removes Java
from the criteria page
On February 28, 2017 7:00:39 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 02/28/2017 10:54 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> The GCC 7 release criteria page mentions Java even though
>> the front end has been removed. The attached patch removes Java
>> from the criteria page. While reviewing the rest of the text
On 02/28/2017 11:09 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 02/28/2017 11:00 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 02/28/2017 10:54 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The GCC 7 release criteria page mentions Java even though
the front end has been removed. The attached patch removes Java
from the criteria page. While reviewing the
On 02/28/2017 11:00 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 02/28/2017 10:54 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The GCC 7 release criteria page mentions Java even though
the front end has been removed. The attached patch removes Java
from the criteria page. While reviewing the rest of the text I
noticed a few minor typos
On 02/28/2017 10:54 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The GCC 7 release criteria page mentions Java even though
the front end has been removed. The attached patch removes Java
from the criteria page. While reviewing the rest of the text I
noticed a few minor typos that I corrected in the patch as well.
The GCC 7 release criteria page mentions Java even though
the front end has been removed. The attached patch removes Java
from the criteria page. While reviewing the rest of the text I
noticed a few minor typos that I corrected in the patch as well.
Btw., as an aside, I read the page to see if
13 matches
Mail list logo
