Ping #4: [PATCH V4 0/5] Add more user friendly TARGET_ names for PowerPC

Ping patches 1-5 to Add more user friendly TARGET_ names for PowerPC: Note, I will be away on vacation from Tuesday February 25th through Friday March 7th. At this point of time, I do not anticipate bringing a laptop that I can respond to emails on this account. Message-ID Information for patc

Ping #3: [PATCH V4 0/5] Add more user friendly TARGET_ names for PowerPC

Ping patches 1-5 to Add more user friendly TARGET_ names for PowerPC: Message-ID Information for patch set: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669067.html Patch #1, Change TARGET_POPCNTB to TARGET_POWER5: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669068.html

Ping #2: [PATCH V4 0/5] Add more user friendly TARGET_ names for PowerPC

Ping patches 1-5 to Add more user friendly TARGET_ names for PowerPC: Message-ID Information for patch set: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669067.html Patch #1, Change TARGET_POPCNTB to TARGET_POWER5: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669068.html

Ping: [PATCH V4 0/5] Add more user friendly TARGET_ names for PowerPC

Ping patches 1-5 to Add more user friendly TARGET_ names for PowerPC: Message-ID Information for patch set: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669067.html Patch #1, Change TARGET_POPCNTB to TARGET_POWER5: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669068.html

[PATCH V4 0/5] Add more user friendly TARGET_ names for PowerPC

Peter Bergner asked me to reorganize my V3 patch that separates the architecture bits (set via -mcpu=) compared to the ISA bits that are based on options. Here is the beginning of the V3 patch for reference: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/668643.html As Peter has suggest