RE: Re: [PATCH V3] VECT: Apply COND_LEN_* into vectorizable_operation

2023-07-12 Thread Li, Pan2 via Gcc-patches
* into vectorizable_operation I fix comments as you suggested. Thanks a lot! Soon will merge it when I finish the bootstrap && regression. juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Richard Sandiford Date: 2023-07-12 20:14 To: juzhe.zhong CC: gcc-patches; rguenther Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] VEC

Re: Re: [PATCH V3] VECT: Apply COND_LEN_* into vectorizable_operation

2023-07-12 Thread 钟居哲
I fix comments as you suggested. Thanks a lot! Soon will merge it when I finish the bootstrap && regression. juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Richard Sandiford Date: 2023-07-12 20:14 To: juzhe.zhong CC: gcc-patches; rguenther Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] VECT: Apply COND_LE

Re: [PATCH V3] VECT: Apply COND_LEN_* into vectorizable_operation

2023-07-12 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai writes: > From: Ju-Zhe Zhong > > Hi, Richard and Richi. > As we disscussed before, COND_LEN_* patterns were added for multiple > situations. > This patch apply CON_LEN_* for the following situation: > > Support for the situation that in "vectorizable_operation": > /* If ope

[PATCH V3] VECT: Apply COND_LEN_* into vectorizable_operation

2023-07-12 Thread juzhe . zhong
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong Hi, Richard and Richi. As we disscussed before, COND_LEN_* patterns were added for multiple situations. This patch apply CON_LEN_* for the following situation: Support for the situation that in "vectorizable_operation": /* If operating on inactive elements could generate spu