On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks so much for your helpful review!
>
> Richard Biener writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:51?AM Jiufu Guo wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Compare with previous version:
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/63239
Hi,
Thanks so much for your helpful review!
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:51 AM Jiufu Guo wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Compare with previous version:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/632399.html
>> This verion supports TI/VEC mode of the access.
>>
>>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:51 AM Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Compare with previous version:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/632399.html
> This verion supports TI/VEC mode of the access.
>
> There are a few PRs (meta-bug PR101926) on various targets.
> The root causes of th
Hi,
I would like to have a ping for this patch.
There are some aspects(TODOs) that can be improved for this patch.
I had some statistics to see if these aspects occur often, by
checking the gcc source code(including test suite) and spec2017.
- Reverse storage order. This only occurs in very few
Hi,
Compare with previous version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/632399.html
This verion supports TI/VEC mode of the access.
There are a few PRs (meta-bug PR101926) on various targets.
The root causes of them are similar: the aggeragte param/
returns are passed by multi-r