On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Lehua Ding wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
> Bootstrap and regression are passed on X86 and
> no new testcases fail on AArch64 with V5 patch:
>
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/625293.html
>
>
> V5 patch is ok for trunk?
Yes.
Hi Richard,
Bootstrap and regression are passed on X86 and
no new testcases fail on AArch64 with V5 patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/625293.html
V5 patch is ok for trunk?
Best,
Lehua
andiford
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Support floating-point in-order reduction for
length loop control
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
>
> This patch support floating-point in-order reduction for loop length cont
: Support floating-point in-order reduction for
length loop control
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
>
> This patch support floating-point in-order reduction for loop length control.
>
> Consider this following
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
>
> This patch support floating-point in-order reduction for loop length control.
>
> Consider this following case:
>
> float foo (float *__restrict a, int n)
> {
> float result = 1.0;
> for (
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
Hi, Richard and Richi.
This patch support floating-point in-order reduction for loop length control.
Consider this following case:
float foo (float *__restrict a, int n)
{
float result = 1.0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
result += a[i];
return result;
}
When compile