E[i];
+ }
+*/
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-07-12 18:59
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CC: richard.sandiford; gcc-patches
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Apply COND_LEN_* into vectorizable_operation
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> Thank yo
i] CODE B[i];
else
LHS[i] = ELSE[i];
}
Does it look reasonable to you?
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Richard Sandiford
Date: 2023-07-12 18:53
To: juzhe.zhong
CC: gcc-patches; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Apply COND_LEN_* into vectorizable_operation
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CT_VL, at the last iteration, it's
probably partial vector, so the element >= length should
keep the original value.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Richard Sandiford
Date: 2023-07-12 18:53
To: juzhe.zhong
CC: gcc-patches; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Apply CO
rivai.ai
>
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Date: 2023-07-12 18:53
> To: juzhe.zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; rguenther
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Apply COND_LEN_* into vectorizable_operation
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai writes:
> > From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
> >
> > Hi, Richa
Thank you so much.
I am gonna wait for Richi's final approval.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Richard Sandiford
Date: 2023-07-12 18:53
To: juzhe.zhong
CC: gcc-patches; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Apply COND_LEN_* into vectorizable_operation
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai writes:
&
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai writes:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
> As we disscussed before, COND_LEN_* patterns were added for multiple
> situations.
> This patch apply CON_LEN_* for the following situation:
>
> Support for the situation that in "vectorizable_operation":
> /* If ope
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
Hi, Richard and Richi.
As we disscussed before, COND_LEN_* patterns were added for multiple situations.
This patch apply CON_LEN_* for the following situation:
Support for the situation that in "vectorizable_operation":
/* If operating on inactive elements could generate spu
