Re: [PATCH V2] RISC-V: XFAIL scan dump fails for autovec PR111311

On 12/10/2023 9:37 PM, Kito Cheng wrote: diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C index b8a2bd1ebbd..6f2fc56c82c 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C @@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ unsigned t

Re: [PATCH V2] RISC-V: XFAIL scan dump fails for autovec PR111311

> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C > index b8a2bd1ebbd..6f2fc56c82c 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C > @@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ unsigned test() >return sum; > } > > -

[PATCH V2] RISC-V: XFAIL scan dump fails for autovec PR111311

Clean up scan dump failures on linux rv64 vector targets Juzhe mentioned could be ignored for now. This will help reduce noise and make it more obvious if a bug or regression is introduced. The failures that are still reported are either execution failures or failures that are also present on armv