Re: [PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-10-12 Thread Richard Sandiford
"Jose E. Marchesi" writes: >> "Jose E. Marchesi" writes: >>> Hi Richard. >>> Thanks for looking at this! :) >>> >>> "Jose E. Marchesi" writes: > ping I don't know this code very well, and have AFAIR haven't worked with an assembler that requires external declarations, but

Re: [PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-10-12 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
> "Jose E. Marchesi" writes: >> Hi Richard. >> Thanks for looking at this! :) >> >> >>> "Jose E. Marchesi" writes: ping >>> >>> I don't know this code very well, and have AFAIR haven't worked >>> with an assembler that requires external declarations, but since >>> it's at a second ping :)

Re: [PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-10-12 Thread Richard Sandiford
"Jose E. Marchesi" writes: > Hi Richard. > Thanks for looking at this! :) > > >> "Jose E. Marchesi" writes: >>> ping >> >> I don't know this code very well, and have AFAIR haven't worked >> with an assembler that requires external declarations, but since >> it's at a second ping :) >> >>> pi

Re: [PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-10-12 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
Hi Richard. Thanks for looking at this! :) > "Jose E. Marchesi" writes: >> ping > > I don't know this code very well, and have AFAIR haven't worked > with an assembler that requires external declarations, but since > it's at a second ping :) > >> >>> ping >>> [Differences from V1: -

Re: [PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-10-05 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/5/23 16:17, Richard Sandiford wrote: "Jose E. Marchesi" writes: ping I don't know this code very well, and have AFAIR haven't worked with an assembler that requires external declarations, but since it's at a second ping :) ping [Differences from V1: - Prototype for call_from_ca

Re: [PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-10-05 Thread Richard Sandiford
"Jose E. Marchesi" writes: > ping I don't know this code very well, and have AFAIR haven't worked with an assembler that requires external declarations, but since it's at a second ping :) > >> ping >> >>> [Differences from V1: >>> - Prototype for call_from_call_insn moved before comment block. >

Re: [PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-10-03 Thread Jose E. Marchesi
ping > ping > >> [Differences from V1: >> - Prototype for call_from_call_insn moved before comment block. >> - Reuse the `call' flag for SYMBOL_REF_LIBCALL. >> - Fallback to check REG_CALL_DECL in non-direct calls. >> - New test to check correct behavior for non-direct calls.] >> >> There are ma

Re: [PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-09-05 Thread Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches
ping^ > ping > >> [Differences from V1: >> - Prototype for call_from_call_insn moved before comment block. >> - Reuse the `call' flag for SYMBOL_REF_LIBCALL. >> - Fallback to check REG_CALL_DECL in non-direct calls. >> - New test to check correct behavior for non-direct calls.] >> >> There are m

Re: [PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-08-30 Thread Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches
ping > [Differences from V1: > - Prototype for call_from_call_insn moved before comment block. > - Reuse the `call' flag for SYMBOL_REF_LIBCALL. > - Fallback to check REG_CALL_DECL in non-direct calls. > - New test to check correct behavior for non-direct calls.] > > There are many places in GCC

[PATCH V2] Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.

2023-08-21 Thread Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches
[Differences from V1: - Prototype for call_from_call_insn moved before comment block. - Reuse the `call' flag for SYMBOL_REF_LIBCALL. - Fallback to check REG_CALL_DECL in non-direct calls. - New test to check correct behavior for non-direct calls.] There are many places in GCC where alternative lo