Re: [PATCH RFC] gimplefe: expose MULT_HIGHPART_EXPR

2018-08-20 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 3:09 PM Alexander Monakov wrote: > > For testing generic expansion of MULT_HIGHPART_EXPR I chose to expose it > via the GIMPLE FE with the following patch. > > "h*" is how tree-pretty-print dumps MULT_HIGHPART_EXPR. > > This patch accepts "h*" which ideally shouldn't happen

[PATCH RFC] gimplefe: expose MULT_HIGHPART_EXPR

2018-08-17 Thread Alexander Monakov
For testing generic expansion of MULT_HIGHPART_EXPR I chose to expose it via the GIMPLE FE with the following patch. "h*" is how tree-pretty-print dumps MULT_HIGHPART_EXPR. This patch accepts "h*" which ideally shouldn't happen, but I don't see a simple way to fix that. Is this desirable for tru