On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 03/08/16 15:02 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Huh. If I'm reading the ABI spec correctly, we should terminate if the
>>> copy constructor throws.
>>>
>> I'll make it t
On 03/08/16 15:02 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Huh. If I'm reading the ABI spec correctly, we should terminate if the
copy constructor throws.
I'll make it terminate like you've suggested then.
Let's leave it as you had it origin
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > > + } // namespace __exception_ptr
> > > >
> > > > /// Obtain an exception_ptr pointing to a copy of the supplied object.
> > > > template
> > > > @@ -173,7 +184,15 @@ namespace std
> > > > #if __cpp_exceptions
> > >
On 03/08/16 14:26 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:48:27AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Does bad_exception need to move to ?
I think only std::exception is really needed by . When I
did header split I when with "move as much as possible" approach, not
the other way arou
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:48:27AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/07/16 10:20 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > [resent with hopefully correct libstdc++ mailing list address this time]
> >
> > Here is my attempt to fix
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297. The resulting patch
On 03/08/16 10:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/07/16 10:20 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
+extern "C" __cxa_refcounted_exception*
+__cxxabiv1::__cxa_init_primary_exception(void *obj, const std::type_info
*tinfo,
+ void (_GLIBCXX_CDTOR_CALLABI *dest)
(
On 28/07/16 10:20 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
[resent with hopefully correct libstdc++ mailing list address this time]
Here is my attempt to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297. The resulting patch
is a little bit long because I had to split and cxxabi.h
"A little bit", yes
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 02:28:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/07/16 10:20 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > [resent with hopefully correct libstdc++ mailing list address this time]
> >
> > Here is my attempt to fix
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297. The resulting patch
On 28/07/16 10:20 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
[resent with hopefully correct libstdc++ mailing list address this time]
Here is my attempt to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297. The resulting patch
is a little bit long because I had to split and cxxabi.h
include files. The for
[resent with hopefully correct libstdc++ mailing list address this time]
Here is my attempt to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297. The resulting patch
is a little bit long because I had to split and cxxabi.h
include files. The former had to be split due to circular dependency
Here is my attempt to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297. The resulting patch
is a little bit long because I had to split and cxxabi.h
include files. The former had to be split due to circular dependency
that formed after including in exception_ptr.h and the later
is because o
11 matches
Mail list logo
