Re: [PATCH RFC] c-family: make -fno-permissive upgrade pedwarns

2023-05-16 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 3:56 PM Jason Merrill wrote: > > On 5/15/23 03:32, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:54 PM Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > >> > >> In the context of the recent discussion, it occurred to me that this > >> semantic > >> would be useful, but cu

Re: [PATCH RFC] c-family: make -fno-permissive upgrade pedwarns

2023-05-15 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On 5/15/23 03:32, Richard Biener wrote: On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:54 PM Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote: In the context of the recent discussion, it occurred to me that this semantic would be useful, but currently there is no easy way to access it. Bikeshedding welcome; the use of this f

Re: [PATCH RFC] c-family: make -fno-permissive upgrade pedwarns

2023-05-15 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:54 PM Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote: > > In the context of the recent discussion, it occurred to me that this semantic > would be useful, but currently there is no easy way to access it. > Bikeshedding > welcome; the use of this flag is a bit odd, but it has the

[PATCH RFC] c-family: make -fno-permissive upgrade pedwarns

2023-05-12 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
In the context of the recent discussion, it occurred to me that this semantic would be useful, but currently there is no easy way to access it. Bikeshedding welcome; the use of this flag is a bit odd, but it has the advantage of being accepted without error going back at least to 4.3. -- 8< -- C