On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 6:54 AM Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 15 2020, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > commit f466a9f3f121f16b97071162806255fb464718f2
> > Author: Jason Merrill
> > Date: Fri May 15 17:15:38 2020 -0400
> >
> > bootstrap: Update requirement to C++11.
> >
Hi,
On Fri, May 15 2020, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> commit f466a9f3f121f16b97071162806255fb464718f2
> Author: Jason Merrill
> Date: Fri May 15 17:15:38 2020 -0400
>
> bootstrap: Update requirement to C++11.
>
> There was general agreement last November that we would mov
On 6/7/20 12:56 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 19:58, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/5/20 12:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:01 PM Christophe Lyon
mailto:christophe.l...@linaro.org>> wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 23:54, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 19:58, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 6/5/20 12:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:01 PM Christophe Lyon
> > mailto:christophe.l...@linaro.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 23:54, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
> > mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.g
On 6/5/20 12:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:01 PM Christophe Lyon
mailto:christophe.l...@linaro.org>> wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 23:54, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>> wrote:
>
> On 5/15/20 2:21 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:01 PM Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 23:54, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/15/20 2:21 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On May 15, 2020 7:30:38 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Merrill
> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:15 AM Richard Biene
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 23:54, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On 5/15/20 2:21 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On May 15, 2020 7:30:38 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Merrill
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:15 AM Richard Biener
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> +# When bootstrapping with GCC, bu
On May 15, 2020 11:53:42 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Merrill wrote:
>On 5/15/20 2:21 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On May 15, 2020 7:30:38 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Merrill
> wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:15 AM Richard Biener
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
> +# When bootstrapping with GCC, build stage 1 in C++11
On 5/15/20 2:21 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On May 15, 2020 7:30:38 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:15 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
+# When bootstrapping with GCC, build stage 1 in C++11 mode to
ensure
that a
+# C++11 compiler can still start the bootstrap.
if tes
On May 15, 2020 7:30:38 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Merrill wrote:
>On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:15 AM Richard Biener
>
>wrote:
>
>> > +# When bootstrapping with GCC, build stage 1 in C++11 mode to
>ensure
>> that a
>> > +# C++11 compiler can still start the bootstrap.
>> > if test "$enable_bootstrap:$GXX"
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:58 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:30 AM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> >> > Note I think what's missing is some general blurb in our coding
> conventions
> >> > as to
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:15 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
> > +# When bootstrapping with GCC, build stage 1 in C++11 mode to ensure
> that a
> > +# C++11 compiler can still start the bootstrap.
> > if test "$enable_bootstrap:$GXX" = "yes:yes"; then
> > + CXX="$CXX -std=gnu++11"
>
> So I just spotte
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:58 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:30 AM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> >> > Note I think what's missing is some general blurb in our coding
> >> > conventions
> >>
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:30 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
>> > Note I think what's missing is some general blurb in our coding conventions
>> > as to how much of C++11 we are supposed to use in non-infrastructure parts
>> >
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:30 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> > Note I think what's missing is some general blurb in our coding conventions
> > as to how much of C++11 we are supposed to use in non-infrastructure parts
> > of GCC (I expect things like hash
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> Note I think what's missing is some general blurb in our coding conventions
> as to how much of C++11 we are supposed to use in non-infrastructure parts
> of GCC (I expect things like hash-table.h to use more C++ features than,
> say, tree-ssa-alias.c).
I
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:53 PM Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> There seemed to be general agreement last November that we would move to
> allowing C++11 features to be used in GCC 11; this patch implements that
> direction. Are changes needed anywhere else?
>
> ChangeLog
> 2020-05-14
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 05:05:59PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> +Versions of GCC prior to 11 also allow bootstrapping with an ISO C++98
> +compiler, versions of GCC prior to 4.8 also allow bootstrapping with a
> +ISO C89 compiler, and versions of GCC prior to 3.4 also allow
> +boot
There seemed to be general agreement last November that we would move to
allowing C++11 features to be used in GCC 11; this patch implements that
direction. Are changes needed anywhere else?
ChangeLog
2020-05-14 Jason Merrill
* configure.ac: Update bootstrap dialect to -std=gnu++11.
19 matches
Mail list logo
