> Benno, do you have write access?
>
> If not I can take care of this for you if you like?
I do not have write access, so that would be great. I've sent a new
version with added Changelog entries and your test to the list.
Do you think there's a chance to get this patch backported to gcc 10?
That
Hi Folks
> On 27 Mar 2022, at 02:33, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 3/17/22 07:37, Benno Evers via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> The coroutine transformation moves the original function body into a
>> newly created actor function, but the block of the
>> `current_binding_level` still points into the origin
On 3/17/22 07:37, Benno Evers via Gcc-patches wrote:
The coroutine transformation moves the original function body into a
newly created actor function, but the block of the
`current_binding_level` still points into the original function,
causing the block to be shared between the two functions if
The coroutine transformation moves the original function body into a
newly created actor function, but the block of the
`current_binding_level` still points into the original function,
causing the block to be shared between the two functions if it is
subsequently used. This may cause havoc later on
