Re: [PATCH RFC] Consolidate some sparc insns patterns using "enabled".

2011-10-24 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Botcazou Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:06:53 +0200 > ...notv9fpu is somewhat ambiguous, fpunotv9 sounds better. I'd also change > the > final (const_int 1) to (const_int 0) if you explicitly test "none" above. Agreed, I'll make these changes and commit to trunk. Thanks for the review

Re: [PATCH RFC] Consolidate some sparc insns patterns using "enabled".

2011-10-24 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Eric, if you could give this some eyeballs I'd really appreciate it. Looks good to me, modulo... > diff --git a/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md b/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > index 0f716d6..3462e6f 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > +++ b/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.md > @@ -240,6 +240,17 @@ >

[PATCH RFC] Consolidate some sparc insns patterns using "enabled".

2011-10-24 Thread David Miller
Eric, if you could give this some eyeballs I'd really appreciate it. I think this brings the number of move patterns down to a more acceptable level. I didn't have the muster to attack the TFmode moves just yet. But honestly I think this is a good start. I quickly ran this through check-gcc bo