Re: [PATCH RFA] libstdc++: fix C header include guards

2024-09-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 11:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 05:10, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? > > I'm going to have to do some digging ... I _think_ there's some > obscure reason for this. Maybe a weird bootstrap situation. Or maybe

Re: [PATCH RFA] libstdc++: fix C header include guards

2024-09-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 05:10, Jason Merrill wrote: > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? I'm going to have to do some digging ... I _think_ there's some obscure reason for this. Maybe a weird bootstrap situation. Or maybe I made that up as rationale for a scripting error. > > -- 8< -- >

[PATCH RFA] libstdc++: fix C header include guards

2024-09-09 Thread Jason Merrill
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? -- 8< -- Ever since the c_global and c_compatibility directories were added in r122533, the include guards have been oddly late in the files, with no comment about why that might be either in the commit message or the files themselves. I don't see any ju