"yangyang (ET)" writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 2:49 AM
>> To: yangyang (ET)
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR96195] aarch64
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 2:49 AM
> To: yangyang (ET)
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR96195] aarch64: ICE during GIMPLE pass:vect
>
> Sorry for the slow r
Sorry for the slow reply.
"yangyang (ET)" writes:
> Hi,
>
> This is a simple fix for PR96195.
>
> For the test case, GCC generates the following gimple statement in
> pass_vect:
>
> vect__21.16_58 = zp.simdclone.2 (vect_vec_iv_.15_56);
>
> The mode of vect__21.16_58 is
Hi,
This is a simple fix for PR96195.
For the test case, GCC generates the following gimple statement in
pass_vect:
vect__21.16_58 = zp.simdclone.2 (vect_vec_iv_.15_56);
The mode of vect__21.16_58 is VNx2SI while the mode of zp.simdclone.2
(vect_vec_iv_.15_5
