> > Cc:GCC Patches
> > Subject:Re: [PATCH PR84648]Adjust loop exit conditions for loop-until-wrap
> > cases.
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 9:02 AM bin.cheng
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >> T
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 11:10, bin.cheng wrote:
>
> --
> Sender:Richard Biener
> Sent at:2018 Nov 13 (Tue) 23:03
> To:bin.cheng
> Cc:GCC Patches
> Subject:Re: [PATCH PR84648]Adjust loop exit conditions for loo
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:09 AM bin.cheng wrote:
>
> --
> Sender:Richard Biener
> Sent at:2018 Nov 13 (Tue) 23:03
> To:bin.cheng
> Cc:GCC Patches
> Subject:Re: [PATCH PR84648]Adjust loop exit condition
--
Sender:Richard Biener
Sent at:2018 Nov 13 (Tue) 23:03
To:bin.cheng
Cc:GCC Patches
Subject:Re: [PATCH PR84648]Adjust loop exit conditions for loop-until-wrap
cases.
>
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 9:02 AM bin.cheng
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 9:02 AM bin.cheng wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This patch fixes PR84648 by adjusting exit conditions for loop-until-wrap
> cases.
> It only handles simple cases in which IV.base are constants because we rely on
> current niter analyzer which doesn't handle parameterized bound in wrapp
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 7:20 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:02:33 +0800
> "bin.cheng" wrote:
>
> Quick observation unrelated to the real patch.
>
> I think the coding style mandates to use the type itself and not the
> underlying structure.
>
> I know there are alot
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:02:33 +0800
"bin.cheng" wrote:
Quick observation unrelated to the real patch.
I think the coding style mandates to use the type itself and not the
underlying structure.
I know there are alot of places from before our switch to C++ that
still use enum tree_code or enum mac
Hi,
This patch fixes PR84648 by adjusting exit conditions for loop-until-wrap cases.
It only handles simple cases in which IV.base are constants because we rely on
current niter analyzer which doesn't handle parameterized bound in wrapped
case. It could be relaxed in the future.
Bootstrap and tes
