On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:03:38PM +0300, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> 2016-02-29 Yuri Rumyantsev
>
> PR tree-optimization/69652
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> * gcc.dg/torture/pr69652.c: Delete test.
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr69652.c: New test.
Ok, with:
/* { dg-additional-options "-mavx -ffast-math" { tar
Jacub!
Here is patch and ChangeLog to move pr69652.c to /vect directory.
Is it OK for trunk.
Thanks.
Yuri.
ChangeLog:
2016-02-29 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR tree-optimization/69652
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/torture/pr69652.c: Delete test.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr69652.c: New test.
2016-02-29 16:
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:01:52AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> > This test simply checks that ICE is not occurred but not any
> > vectorization issues.
>
> Can we remove
>
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize " } */
>
> then?
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> This test simply checks that ICE is not occurred but not any
> vectorization issues.
Can we remove
/* { dg-options "-O2 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize " } */
then?
H.J.
> Best regards.
> Yuri.
>
> 2016-02-28 20:29 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
>>
This test simply checks that ICE is not occurred but not any
vectorization issues.
Best regards.
Yuri.
2016-02-28 20:29 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu :
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
>> Thanks Richard for your comments.
>> I changes algorithm to remove dead scalar statements as yo
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Thanks Richard for your comments.
> I changes algorithm to remove dead scalar statements as you proposed.
>
> Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures on x86-64.
> Is it OK for trunk?
>
> Changelog:
> 2016-02-10 Yuri
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Thanks Richard for your comments.
> I changes algorithm to remove dead scalar statements as you proposed.
>
> Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures on x86-64.
> Is it OK for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Changel
Thanks Richard for your comments.
I changes algorithm to remove dead scalar statements as you proposed.
Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures on x86-64.
Is it OK for trunk?
Changelog:
2016-02-10 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR tree-optimization/69652
* tree-vect-loop.c (optimize_m
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is updated patch - I came back to move call statements also since
> masked loads are presented by internal call. I also assume that for
> the following simple loop
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
> if (b1[i])
> a1[i]
Hi All,
Here is updated patch - I came back to move call statements also since
masked loads are presented by internal call. I also assume that for
the following simple loop
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
if (b1[i])
a1[i] = sqrtf(a2[i] * a2[i] + a3[i] * a3[i]);
motion must be done for all vec
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:46:27PM +0300, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Here is a patch that cures the issues with non-correct vuse for scalar
> statements during code motion, i.e. if vuse of scalar statement is
> vdef of masked store which has been sunk to new basic block, we must
> fix it up. The pat
Hi All,
Here is a patch that cures the issues with non-correct vuse for scalar
statements during code motion, i.e. if vuse of scalar statement is
vdef of masked store which has been sunk to new basic block, we must
fix it up. The patch also fixed almost all remarks pointed out by
Jacub.
Bootstra
12 matches
Mail list logo
