On 03/23/2016 09:29 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
I think the patch is ok and eventually we need to revisit the outer loop
handling with this as an excuse.
Yes, currently GCC doesn't handle loop nest at all. Will revisit this
part in coming stage1.
Patch applied as revision 234429.
So given there's f
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> > When I tried to decrease # of IV candidates, I re
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > When I tried to decrease # of IV candidates, I removed code that adds IV
>> > candidates for use with constant of
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> > Hi,
> > When I tried to decrease # of IV candidates, I removed code that adds IV
> > candidates for use with constant offset stripped in use->base. This is
> > kind of too aggress
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> When I tried to decrease # of IV candidates, I removed code that adds IV
> candidates for use with constant offset stripped in use->base. This is kind
> of too aggressive and triggers PR69042. So here is a patch adding back the
> miss
Hi,
When I tried to decrease # of IV candidates, I removed code that adds IV
candidates for use with constant offset stripped in use->base. This is kind of
too aggressive and triggers PR69042. So here is a patch adding back the
missing candidates. Honestly, this patch doesn't truly fix the is